OK, now I'm here writing this a little earlier than I wanted to be. But I am totally thrilled and at the same time a little dulled with predictability that The Master is back in Doctor Who.
Yeah yeah, we knew it was coming. Right from February this year, 2007 when it was reported in British Sunday newspaper, 'The Independent On Sunday' (11th February issue) that John Simm WAS to play the role. And since that time the speculators had been going into overdrive as to how the role would manifest itself. But even then all we knew was that he would be playing the role of Harold Saxon, politician.
The first time we heard of Mr Saxon was, of course, the Christmas episode 2006, 'The Runaway Bride' when, "under orders from Mr Saxon", the army opened fire on and destroyed the Racnoss ship bringing it down and destroying it. Why did he do that? Will we find out why? That is unknown at this point.
From then, Mr Saxon has been one of those recurring themes that we have had through Series 3. In Episode 1, "Smith And Jones", there were election posters with his name on in the background in the final scenes when Martha enters the Tardis. "The Lazarus Experiment", of course, had us seeing him direct for the first time as both the sponsor of the main event and as the Mysterious Man warning Martha's mother of the 'dangers' of The Doctor. A telephone call to find the answer to one of the door unlocking questions in "42" was next, and also at the end of that episode we saw Martha's mother again under the watchful eye of Mr Saxon's associates while they tried to get a trace on his location. Another little break, and now HERE HE IS!
Or rather there he will be and was. Because he was The Professor in the laboratory at the end of the universe trying to get the rocket working to save the remains of humanity from the vampire Future Kind, and it seemed to be a success (but WHERE will those humans end up?). Not sure where saving those humans fits in with anything and not sure HOW he ended up here either.
BUT it was all unfolding VERY nicely indeed. The Face Of Boe's prophecy, "You Are Not Alone". OK, yet again it was obvious in the end who THAT was about. But there's more. The Derek Jacobi 'Master' said that he had been found abandoned as an orphan boy in the Silver Devastation. Guess what! THIS is the VERY SAME place in the universe where The Face Of Boe is supposed to be from!!
So what do we get from this? Hmm, now we are speculating again. The Face Of Boe brought him up as a child? The face Of Boe knew who he was and so sent him to the last possible place in the universe where he knew (or THOUGHT) he could not get away from? And before doing that he would have had to put him through the Chameleon Arch process as The Doctor went through a few episodes back. Hmm again.
What about the Time War? And how did The Master escape from The Eye Of Harmony where he had been sucked into last time we saw him with Paul McGann in the 1996 TV movie. What I think is this: during the Time War he was able to escape The Eye Of Harmony which was probably severely weakened by the Dalek force and their attack. He had not been killed by The Eye - just kept prisoner forever (or so it seemed).
And what we have now is a three-parter to end Series 3. Oh, THAT MAN Russell T. Davies does it again. You know what? Wikipedia has had Utopia listed apart from the other episodes since they began and no-one had a SINGLE CLUE that it would end up like this. Those cunning people at the BBC kept it from us so as not to give away the Final Secret.
Just like I said last time. The low point of Series 3 has passed away some time ago and now we are peaking, Peaking, PEAKING!!!!! TOTALLY AND UTTERLY FANTASTIC STUFF!!! And 100 percent gripping until the end in two weeks time.
The End?? Can it be true? No, I must be mistaken. Yup, only TWO MORE EPISODES TO GO and then that's it until Christmas! Darn, I wish I had a Tardis myself to go forward to then.
But before I do that, I simply HAVE TO get myself a copy somewhere of that 1996 Doctor Who TV Movie. All I've seen is the McCoy-to-McGan regeneration sequence. And the photo on Wikipedia of them battling it out over The Eye. GOT TO GET IT!!!
And to end with, an admission. Those of you who visit my blog more than once (and I KNOW there ARE some out there) will notice that yesterday's survey has been quickly and miraculously replaced by a new (and rather hastily conceived idea for) one. Well, you know, I thought that previous survey was actually a good 'un and I really didn't imagine that we would find out THIS WEEK that Mr Saxon was who we supposed him to be. Not sure that I like the new poll I've done, so if I think of a new and better one I'll get it in there.
Saturday 16 June 2007
Friday 15 June 2007
The ten regenerations of Doctor Who from William Hartnell to David Tennant
Hello again. Two blogs in two days - must be a record. Anyway I came across this regeneration sequence of videos on YouTube today and thought you'd all like to see it. We go all the way - William Hartnell to Patrick troughton to Jon Pertwee to Tom Baker to Peter Davison to Colin Baker to Sylvester McCoy to Paul McGann to Christopher Eccleston to David Tennant.
ENJOY! So which one was your favourite regeneration sequence then? Mine definitely (despite losing the great man) was from Tom Baker to Peter Davison (even though it was the beginning of the downfall of the series).
ENJOY! So which one was your favourite regeneration sequence then? Mine definitely (despite losing the great man) was from Tom Baker to Peter Davison (even though it was the beginning of the downfall of the series).
Thursday 14 June 2007
Don't Blink, Don't Turn Your Back or you'll miss this Blog!
Hold on a mo though. Just before I get into this one I want to put right something that was maybe a little cloudy last week. And that is this: I really DID like the two-part story "Human Nature / Family Of Blood". Probably the best of Series 3 so far. And the character of Jeremy Baines was BRILLIANTLY done. So although I had my criticisms of the second of the parts, the story as a whole stands up to anything else over this series. And the last series, and even Series 1.
There, that's put the record straight.
A Doctor-light episode .... Last time they said that we had the biggest and most complete load of DROSS OF ALL TIME with 'Love And Monsters' featuring the Abzorbaloff. When I saw they were doing ANOTHER one I froze with horror.
Ah, but THIS one was written by one of my favourite Dr Who writers, Steven Moffat. He is the man responsible for possibly my favourite story of Series 1 - 'The Empty Child / The Doctor Dances'. And he has a forthcoming BBC serial update of Jekyll And Hyde to be shown later this year. So he is GOOD!!
Before transmission of this story, we were, as ever, promised the world. Promised a monster that would make us jump - REALLY jump! A real behind-the-sofa Doctor Who monster of old! I tell you what - they certainly got the hype machine going for THIS one!
Oh, but it WAS good. And it DID make me JUMP even especially in that sequence towards the end when Larry Nightingale is left staring his heart out at the advancing Weeping Angel which gets oh-so-much-closer every time he takes his eyes off it, and it gets to within inches of his face with teeth and claws showing for all at home to see.
GREAT STUFF! And it really DIDN'T matter that The Doctor wasn't much in it this time. I guess they learnt from last time to involve him just a little more. Or was it all really EXACTLY like last time with the Abzorbaloff and I just didn't notice this time round? Not sure.
And it was such a clever idea for a story too. Most of it anyway. The idea, as The Doctor put it, that Time Is Not A Linear Progression But Is More Of Wibbly-Wobby Timey-Wimey Kind Of Stuff gave us the basis perhaps. It was one of those story lines that leaves you with a LOAD of, "How Did They ....?", or, "How Could He .... If ....?", kind of questions. Keeps you talking and thinking about it all evening and even all night. A similar thing happened to me when I watched two other - completely unrelated - films: "Total Recall" and "The Talented Mr Ripley". The kind of plots where after you've watched them fill you with so many unanswered questions, Why's and Who-Was's and How-Could's that you just HAVE TO sit back and admire just how good those writers are.
At first I didn't get why Kathy Nightingale was transported back to the past and then later why Billy Shipton was too. If they were not dead then was the story of how they would return to the present, I wondered. Ah, but on second viewing I quickly realised what was going on. Oh, darn - there I go analyzing again! Bloody adult mind that I have!!
And I certainly didn't understand why the Weeping Angels suddenly started coming after them. But it was THE KEY, stupid!! Yes, of COURSE it was!
And then the Grand Finale - the final chase of Sparrow and Nightingale through the building, through the car park, into the Tardis (and HOW could those mere HUMANS get IN THERE?? ANYTHING could have happened!!). That was then followed by the final sequence in the shop where Sally Sparrow sees The Doctor get out of a .... TAXI!! .... and then rushes out to give them all the scripts and other stuff that they would need ..... kind of ..... later .... or is it earlier? No LATER definitely because they said so.
Yes, we've definitely passed that middle-dip in the series and all the naff episodes are out the way now. Good Bye 'Shakespeare Code'! Good Bye '42'! And next week we hold onto our seats again for what the pre-episode promos call "A Pivotal Doctor Who Moment", featuring Captain Jack's return and Derek Jacobi as .... The Professor ....
Feeling a bit low myself for a moment here. Do you realise out there that in ONLY THREE WEEKS TIME it'll be the end of Doctor Who until .... well, CHRISTMAS I suppose!! WAAGGHH!! WHAT the hell are we gonna do every Saturday evening at 7 o'clock?
So until That Pivotal Moment comes I will wish you goodbye.
Now, next time I write, it'll be about some really great Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker stories I've been watching recently. And not-so good Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker stories too. But not at the same time! See ya!!
There, that's put the record straight.
A Doctor-light episode .... Last time they said that we had the biggest and most complete load of DROSS OF ALL TIME with 'Love And Monsters' featuring the Abzorbaloff. When I saw they were doing ANOTHER one I froze with horror.
Ah, but THIS one was written by one of my favourite Dr Who writers, Steven Moffat. He is the man responsible for possibly my favourite story of Series 1 - 'The Empty Child / The Doctor Dances'. And he has a forthcoming BBC serial update of Jekyll And Hyde to be shown later this year. So he is GOOD!!
Before transmission of this story, we were, as ever, promised the world. Promised a monster that would make us jump - REALLY jump! A real behind-the-sofa Doctor Who monster of old! I tell you what - they certainly got the hype machine going for THIS one!
Oh, but it WAS good. And it DID make me JUMP even especially in that sequence towards the end when Larry Nightingale is left staring his heart out at the advancing Weeping Angel which gets oh-so-much-closer every time he takes his eyes off it, and it gets to within inches of his face with teeth and claws showing for all at home to see.
GREAT STUFF! And it really DIDN'T matter that The Doctor wasn't much in it this time. I guess they learnt from last time to involve him just a little more. Or was it all really EXACTLY like last time with the Abzorbaloff and I just didn't notice this time round? Not sure.
And it was such a clever idea for a story too. Most of it anyway. The idea, as The Doctor put it, that Time Is Not A Linear Progression But Is More Of Wibbly-Wobby Timey-Wimey Kind Of Stuff gave us the basis perhaps. It was one of those story lines that leaves you with a LOAD of, "How Did They ....?", or, "How Could He .... If ....?", kind of questions. Keeps you talking and thinking about it all evening and even all night. A similar thing happened to me when I watched two other - completely unrelated - films: "Total Recall" and "The Talented Mr Ripley". The kind of plots where after you've watched them fill you with so many unanswered questions, Why's and Who-Was's and How-Could's that you just HAVE TO sit back and admire just how good those writers are.
At first I didn't get why Kathy Nightingale was transported back to the past and then later why Billy Shipton was too. If they were not dead then was the story of how they would return to the present, I wondered. Ah, but on second viewing I quickly realised what was going on. Oh, darn - there I go analyzing again! Bloody adult mind that I have!!
And I certainly didn't understand why the Weeping Angels suddenly started coming after them. But it was THE KEY, stupid!! Yes, of COURSE it was!
And then the Grand Finale - the final chase of Sparrow and Nightingale through the building, through the car park, into the Tardis (and HOW could those mere HUMANS get IN THERE?? ANYTHING could have happened!!). That was then followed by the final sequence in the shop where Sally Sparrow sees The Doctor get out of a .... TAXI!! .... and then rushes out to give them all the scripts and other stuff that they would need ..... kind of ..... later .... or is it earlier? No LATER definitely because they said so.
Yes, we've definitely passed that middle-dip in the series and all the naff episodes are out the way now. Good Bye 'Shakespeare Code'! Good Bye '42'! And next week we hold onto our seats again for what the pre-episode promos call "A Pivotal Doctor Who Moment", featuring Captain Jack's return and Derek Jacobi as .... The Professor ....
Feeling a bit low myself for a moment here. Do you realise out there that in ONLY THREE WEEKS TIME it'll be the end of Doctor Who until .... well, CHRISTMAS I suppose!! WAAGGHH!! WHAT the hell are we gonna do every Saturday evening at 7 o'clock?
So until That Pivotal Moment comes I will wish you goodbye.
Now, next time I write, it'll be about some really great Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker stories I've been watching recently. And not-so good Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker stories too. But not at the same time! See ya!!
Monday 4 June 2007
"You Wouldn't Want To Worship Me. I'd Make A Very Bad God"
So said the Ninth Doctor, Christopher Eccleston, to Margaret Slitheen when, on entering the Tardis she was in awe of the whole thing and how wonderful it was. Well, now we are starting to know what he meant.
A slightly bizarre ending to "The Family Of Blood", and a very dark one too. I think I remember reading somewhere that another rumour on The-Master-Or-Not ending was that Mr Saxon would actually turn out NOT to be The Master but some kind of Really-Bad-Guy future incarnation of The Doctor of way into the future. This may well prove to be right based on what we saw in this two-part story.
But it's just a little tricky to get your head around it all. So here goes: The Doctor and Martha at the start are apparently escaping from The Family Of Blood as we see a laser shot. The Doctor sees they can follow him anywhere through time and space so feels it might be better to hide somewhere as a human because that way they could not trace him. He hopes too that they did not see Martha's face. This is what we saw in the "Human Nature" episode, and you would be quite sensible to conclude that this was some kind of rare enemy that The Doctor really WAS afraid of. Even more scary than the Daleks and Cybermen - those two must be like wimps in comparison to the mighty FAMILY! So this is what we take through episode 8 until the conclusion of that where they find him - the Human 'him' that is.
Through we go then to the "Family Of Blood" episode where the Quest For The Watch is on. We assume, and are made to believe, that if John Smith can find the watch before The Family then he can turn back into The Doctor (and miraculously regain his internal biology!). He can then know what to do, will not be afraid any more of this previously terrifying enemy (whose fear factor will have miraculously gone for him), and can then fight them all off and Save The Day Once More (Hurrah Hurrah!)
Ah, but no. It's all turned on its head! Turns out that the reason The Doctor wanted to hide is that he wanted to spare The Family their Ultimate Punishment (which they all got in the end anyway!). He wanted to show them mercy by pretending he had disappeared and so they would, in the end, just die off "like mayflies" with Punishment Not Administered. Kind of like dying of Old Age when on Death Row I suppose.
Well, I think I've analysed it enough from An Adult Point Of View which of course is completely wrong in a programme made for children (Gee, we adults spoil the whole thing, eh!).
While watching "The Family Of Blood" on Saturday night I found myself thinking two things. Firstly, that this was yet another two-parter where the second of the two parts was something of a let-down when compared to the first part. They've all been that way actually right back to Eccleston days. Part 1 full of great things, Part 2 The Doctor cleans up and makes the drama of Part 1 look like it needn't have happened. Secondly, what a rather LAME ending it WAS! I mean, The Doctor tricks The Family pretending he's still John Smith gives them the Fake Watch then falls around the place pressing a few buttons, they then fall for this little charade and the end result of this is that something that could have been done by anyone at any time happens and End-Of-Story. I mean, come ON! If all it takes to blow up a ship like that is to press a few buttons In The Wrong Way, then it ain't much of a ship, IS IT? And I think we deserved a better ending than THAT!!
Speaking of Lame Endings, it gets me thinking of previous two-parters and how they ended in comparison to this:-
DALEKS IN MANHATTAN / EVOLUTION OF THE DALEKS --> This actually wasn't a bad ending at all except that by rights The Doctor should have been dead with such a huge bolt of lightning going all the way through his body from SUCH a big storm as we were told it was
ARMY OF GHOSTS / DOOMSDAY (Series 2) --> Utterly superb of course since it was the end of Series 2 and the dramatic departure of Rose. But since it WAS the end-of-series, you would expect it to be good!
IMPOSSIBLE PLANET / SATAN PIT (Series 2) --> Many people criticised this story, but I really loved it as a whole. But it has to be said that it made NO SENSE AT ALL that Rose could shoot out the window of the rocket with a bolt gun and not have the WHOLE CREW sucked out together. Seat belts holding them in? Yeah, right, and isn't space a .... VACUUM??!!
RISE OF THE CYBERMEN / AGE OF STEEL (Series 2) --> Got to be one of the dumbest endings of a Doctor Who story, as good as the rest of the story was up until that ending. OK, Mickey hacks the computer, gets the code 'somehow' (was the Binary 9 enough of a clue?), sends it to Rose's phone, The Doctor then conveniently has a point to plunge Rose's phone into (remember, an ORDINARY MOBILE PHONE!), sticks it in there and hey presto he causes chaos with the Cybermen. And blows up the factory too while we're at it. Talk about something outta nothing!! And a stupid ending to an otherwise great story.
BAD WOLF / PARTING OF THE WAYS (Series 1) --> Was again full of drama being the end of the series and end of Doctor Who #9. Rose, Mickey and the car breakdown crane yank open the Tardis's innards (the time vortex) which then goes into Rose's mind and makes her some kind of Mega-God-Of-Time and able to do what she wants - killing, turning to dust, bringing back to life etc. Did I like that one? Yes and no. It provided the way forward for the regeneration though in a somewhat bizarre way, and wouldn't the time vortex have fried Rose's brain a whole lot sooner? I mean, if it made the Doc do a regen so quickly then why was Rose virtually unhurt? Ah, because The Doctor sucked it all out! Hmm .... OK then.
EMPTY CHILD / DOCTOR DANCES --> One of my real favourites over these three series. And yes, I even liked the ending. Yes, it is plausible that these nanogenes could, intelligent as they were, recognise the parent DNA and change all things back and then the newly-enlightened nanogenes could certainly then put the rest of the gasmask-people back to normal. So that was a good story. BUT I'm not sure about how ol' Captain Jack managed to hook up with the Tardis and escape just before his ship exploded. Well, a small thing and I won't worry too much about it. It just DID, alright?
ALIENS OF LONDON / WORLD WAR THREE --> The Slitheens went from being big and fearsome in part one to floppy and just a bit pathetic in part 2. Fine when they were done in CGI, silly otherwise. Their hands were just too darn BIG! And OK, so Mickey and The Doc hacked their way into the Royal Navy computer to launch the missile and somehow managed to stop it getting intercepted. Gee, that Mickey sure learns fast! I mean, just HOW DID HE stop it being intercepted. Again, a small detail. I don't know if I'd be that scared of a Slitheen - big pot-bellies, oversized ridiculous hands that you could probably pull off if you tugged hard enough and slow-moving (but NOT so slow in CGI!!). So a good part two? Yes, but a little too condensed for my liking.
So if you look at these opinions of mine you can probably see a trend forming. Two-part Doctor Who stories are kind of running out of steam. They could probably fit a whole two-parter into one whole hour I reckon. That was another thing I was thinking on Saturday night - how it was really a one-and-a-half-parter.
Back to the present then. So we've seen a darker side to Doctor Who that will, no doubt, climax in the end of the Series in some way. Now I'm not so sure that Mr Saxon IS The Master after all but is some kind of evil alter-ego which has found its way back to meet The Doctor in present time to confront him to stop him in his tracks. A bit like that if Mr Saxon won, there would ne no chance he could be stopped in the future. OR, in a Terminator kind of way, he has come from the future to prevent the future from happening (if you see what I mean).
Next week is one of those Doctor-light episodes so I don't think I'll bother writing about that. But surely I'll come up with something to entertain you (and myself) with!
Before I sign off, I want to say just HOW GOOD WAS THE CHARACTER OF JEREMY BAINES!! A really SUPERB PERFORMANCE by the actor involved, Harry Lloyd! Oh, and I discovered, to my amusement, that the girl who played the character of the Daughter Of Mine (red balloon girl) is in fact a Canadian ice skater!
See ya next time then, Time Lords!
A slightly bizarre ending to "The Family Of Blood", and a very dark one too. I think I remember reading somewhere that another rumour on The-Master-Or-Not ending was that Mr Saxon would actually turn out NOT to be The Master but some kind of Really-Bad-Guy future incarnation of The Doctor of way into the future. This may well prove to be right based on what we saw in this two-part story.
But it's just a little tricky to get your head around it all. So here goes: The Doctor and Martha at the start are apparently escaping from The Family Of Blood as we see a laser shot. The Doctor sees they can follow him anywhere through time and space so feels it might be better to hide somewhere as a human because that way they could not trace him. He hopes too that they did not see Martha's face. This is what we saw in the "Human Nature" episode, and you would be quite sensible to conclude that this was some kind of rare enemy that The Doctor really WAS afraid of. Even more scary than the Daleks and Cybermen - those two must be like wimps in comparison to the mighty FAMILY! So this is what we take through episode 8 until the conclusion of that where they find him - the Human 'him' that is.
Through we go then to the "Family Of Blood" episode where the Quest For The Watch is on. We assume, and are made to believe, that if John Smith can find the watch before The Family then he can turn back into The Doctor (and miraculously regain his internal biology!). He can then know what to do, will not be afraid any more of this previously terrifying enemy (whose fear factor will have miraculously gone for him), and can then fight them all off and Save The Day Once More (Hurrah Hurrah!)
Ah, but no. It's all turned on its head! Turns out that the reason The Doctor wanted to hide is that he wanted to spare The Family their Ultimate Punishment (which they all got in the end anyway!). He wanted to show them mercy by pretending he had disappeared and so they would, in the end, just die off "like mayflies" with Punishment Not Administered. Kind of like dying of Old Age when on Death Row I suppose.
Well, I think I've analysed it enough from An Adult Point Of View which of course is completely wrong in a programme made for children (Gee, we adults spoil the whole thing, eh!).
While watching "The Family Of Blood" on Saturday night I found myself thinking two things. Firstly, that this was yet another two-parter where the second of the two parts was something of a let-down when compared to the first part. They've all been that way actually right back to Eccleston days. Part 1 full of great things, Part 2 The Doctor cleans up and makes the drama of Part 1 look like it needn't have happened. Secondly, what a rather LAME ending it WAS! I mean, The Doctor tricks The Family pretending he's still John Smith gives them the Fake Watch then falls around the place pressing a few buttons, they then fall for this little charade and the end result of this is that something that could have been done by anyone at any time happens and End-Of-Story. I mean, come ON! If all it takes to blow up a ship like that is to press a few buttons In The Wrong Way, then it ain't much of a ship, IS IT? And I think we deserved a better ending than THAT!!
Speaking of Lame Endings, it gets me thinking of previous two-parters and how they ended in comparison to this:-
DALEKS IN MANHATTAN / EVOLUTION OF THE DALEKS --> This actually wasn't a bad ending at all except that by rights The Doctor should have been dead with such a huge bolt of lightning going all the way through his body from SUCH a big storm as we were told it was
ARMY OF GHOSTS / DOOMSDAY (Series 2) --> Utterly superb of course since it was the end of Series 2 and the dramatic departure of Rose. But since it WAS the end-of-series, you would expect it to be good!
IMPOSSIBLE PLANET / SATAN PIT (Series 2) --> Many people criticised this story, but I really loved it as a whole. But it has to be said that it made NO SENSE AT ALL that Rose could shoot out the window of the rocket with a bolt gun and not have the WHOLE CREW sucked out together. Seat belts holding them in? Yeah, right, and isn't space a .... VACUUM??!!
RISE OF THE CYBERMEN / AGE OF STEEL (Series 2) --> Got to be one of the dumbest endings of a Doctor Who story, as good as the rest of the story was up until that ending. OK, Mickey hacks the computer, gets the code 'somehow' (was the Binary 9 enough of a clue?), sends it to Rose's phone, The Doctor then conveniently has a point to plunge Rose's phone into (remember, an ORDINARY MOBILE PHONE!), sticks it in there and hey presto he causes chaos with the Cybermen. And blows up the factory too while we're at it. Talk about something outta nothing!! And a stupid ending to an otherwise great story.
BAD WOLF / PARTING OF THE WAYS (Series 1) --> Was again full of drama being the end of the series and end of Doctor Who #9. Rose, Mickey and the car breakdown crane yank open the Tardis's innards (the time vortex) which then goes into Rose's mind and makes her some kind of Mega-God-Of-Time and able to do what she wants - killing, turning to dust, bringing back to life etc. Did I like that one? Yes and no. It provided the way forward for the regeneration though in a somewhat bizarre way, and wouldn't the time vortex have fried Rose's brain a whole lot sooner? I mean, if it made the Doc do a regen so quickly then why was Rose virtually unhurt? Ah, because The Doctor sucked it all out! Hmm .... OK then.
EMPTY CHILD / DOCTOR DANCES --> One of my real favourites over these three series. And yes, I even liked the ending. Yes, it is plausible that these nanogenes could, intelligent as they were, recognise the parent DNA and change all things back and then the newly-enlightened nanogenes could certainly then put the rest of the gasmask-people back to normal. So that was a good story. BUT I'm not sure about how ol' Captain Jack managed to hook up with the Tardis and escape just before his ship exploded. Well, a small thing and I won't worry too much about it. It just DID, alright?
ALIENS OF LONDON / WORLD WAR THREE --> The Slitheens went from being big and fearsome in part one to floppy and just a bit pathetic in part 2. Fine when they were done in CGI, silly otherwise. Their hands were just too darn BIG! And OK, so Mickey and The Doc hacked their way into the Royal Navy computer to launch the missile and somehow managed to stop it getting intercepted. Gee, that Mickey sure learns fast! I mean, just HOW DID HE stop it being intercepted. Again, a small detail. I don't know if I'd be that scared of a Slitheen - big pot-bellies, oversized ridiculous hands that you could probably pull off if you tugged hard enough and slow-moving (but NOT so slow in CGI!!). So a good part two? Yes, but a little too condensed for my liking.
So if you look at these opinions of mine you can probably see a trend forming. Two-part Doctor Who stories are kind of running out of steam. They could probably fit a whole two-parter into one whole hour I reckon. That was another thing I was thinking on Saturday night - how it was really a one-and-a-half-parter.
Back to the present then. So we've seen a darker side to Doctor Who that will, no doubt, climax in the end of the Series in some way. Now I'm not so sure that Mr Saxon IS The Master after all but is some kind of evil alter-ego which has found its way back to meet The Doctor in present time to confront him to stop him in his tracks. A bit like that if Mr Saxon won, there would ne no chance he could be stopped in the future. OR, in a Terminator kind of way, he has come from the future to prevent the future from happening (if you see what I mean).
Next week is one of those Doctor-light episodes so I don't think I'll bother writing about that. But surely I'll come up with something to entertain you (and myself) with!
Before I sign off, I want to say just HOW GOOD WAS THE CHARACTER OF JEREMY BAINES!! A really SUPERB PERFORMANCE by the actor involved, Harry Lloyd! Oh, and I discovered, to my amusement, that the girl who played the character of the Daughter Of Mine (red balloon girl) is in fact a Canadian ice skater!
See ya next time then, Time Lords!
Friday 1 June 2007
Doctor Who to be Deleted after Series 4?? It's a Dalek Rumour!
OK, now I am not one for reacting wildly to newspaper stories which are, most likely, gossip, tittle-tattle, most-likely unfounded, bordering-on ridiculous and plain scandalous at best. But I feel that I have to write a piece about what English tabloid newspaper 'The Sun' has been saying about Doctor Who, about Freema Agyeman (Martha), about Russell T. Davies and about the whole institute of Dr Who as we know it today.
There was a story published in The Sun yesterday, 31st May. The title of this was, "Doctor Who to get axe in 2008" and the gist of this so-called 'story' is that Russell T. and the guys have had enough of their 16-hour Dr Who days and are all going to quit together in summer 2008. You can also see a forum thread here also on this topic
My first reaction, as was many of yours too, was absolute shock and UTTER HORROR that the BBC could consider doing such a thing.
But that's the way 'The Sun' newspaper works, you see. What they have gone on for this report, it seems, is one of those Anonymous Sources. And whizz-bang - you have a news story!
BUT it's also a news story that I can't ignore and can't totally dismiss. I don't mean the content of the story itself and what The Sun Says - NO! What I mean is that way back at the start of this blog's creation I actually speculated about this myself in Blog Entry Number One. If you don't recall that far back, I basically said that I was wondering how they would carry on past the middle of Series 4 next year. One Time Lord generation gone, one companion gone (Rose), cybermen seemingly all gone, Daleks reduced to just one again, the great Face Of Boe dead and soon to be revived Master making a comeback. Options for good storylines definitely ARE being dried up.
Of course, the thing about sci-fi is that The Universe Is A Big Place And All Things Can Happen. And Doctor Who is very much proof of THAT little number!
The question is this: with many good and strong storylines and baddies used up, where is the strength coming from for future series (beyond Series 4 anyway)? It's a GOOD question, isn't it? But why, you say, should we answer it since if we WERE able to answer it then it would make it all far too predictable and therefore not watchable and it might once again descend into the Pit Of Bad Writing. And no-ones wants THAT ugly monster to rear IT'S hideous head, do they?
As i said at the start, this blog entry was inspired by more than one of The Sun's little articles lately. The second nasty little rumour they're putting about is that Freema Agyeman is to be sacked from the show. BUT they don't give any idea as to WHEN this is supposed to happen. Yup, it's another of these Anonymous Sources spreading it about a bit, causing trouble, making chaos.
Well, Dr Who is to be congratulated if The Sun is taking so much interest in it. I mean, there are so many things, so many shows on TV and so many showbiz stars they could choose to attack and undermine. So it is definitely a great complement to all that Russell T. Davies and the crew have achieved in their brilliant revival of The World's Greatest Time Traveller that so much is being said - albeit from not the most reliable journalistic source on the planet!
News stories like these just make me angry that there are people calling themselves journalists who just try to create the news by extrapolating the "truth" from Anonymous Sources who might have 1001 reasons why they would want to damage the people or insitutions they give their little leaks on. This is what we get from a free press of course, but that is not any topic of THIS blog.
I was thinking and wondering about this all last evening after reading about it. Today I read this news story from ITV News which did put me at my ease a bit mainly because of the speed of the reaction from the BBC to The Sun's story. In it, a BBC spokesman has described the story as "idle speculation". Good! Err .... but hold on a moment. Do I believe an Anonymous Source or an Anonymous Spokesman? Hmmm .... well, I prefer the spokesman's view myself. I guess it shows that maybe we believe what we want to believe! Well, let's say that I believe what the BBC says over and above what The Sun newspaper says! NO CONTEST!! The spokesman also said that "the BBC has a long-term commitment to Doctor Who". Nuff said! Case closed (almost!).
Last of all, I want to comment on this report from Sky News that Russell T. Davies wants to have more time to concentrate on other projects. He might well, yes, and after all Doctor Who is not the only thing he has done as we well know. Certainly he has a lot of good shows on TV now and from the near-past. But the nature of writing for TV and for a programme like Doctor Who is, unfortunately, that you DO have to give it a lot of your time. But I see that even now RTD is delegating more of the writing to others - look at Helen Raynor's credit in the Daleks In Manhattan story when in actual fact it was Russell's ideas that were given her to put together (and I see now she doesn't do Script Editing any more!). In addition, as much as I am enjoying this two-parter Human Nature / Family Of Blood, we all know full well that the idea is from a book. I wonder how many other Dr Who stories started off life as books - not many I'll bet! So that is possible another indication that RTD is trying to make time for himself and his other work. I also read here in this news story from 23rd March this year on some kind of speculation from the Series 3 Launch Party about a possible "spin off" movie. Now that IS INTERESTING!!
So, in summary, any thought of killing off Doctor Who after Series 4 or at any time before that is completely out of the question and the BBC would be stark-staring bonkers to quit on such a bankable number as The Doc! ZAP!!!!!! CASE CLOSED (in a Judoon kind of way)!!!
There was a story published in The Sun yesterday, 31st May. The title of this was, "Doctor Who to get axe in 2008" and the gist of this so-called 'story' is that Russell T. and the guys have had enough of their 16-hour Dr Who days and are all going to quit together in summer 2008. You can also see a forum thread here also on this topic
My first reaction, as was many of yours too, was absolute shock and UTTER HORROR that the BBC could consider doing such a thing.
But that's the way 'The Sun' newspaper works, you see. What they have gone on for this report, it seems, is one of those Anonymous Sources. And whizz-bang - you have a news story!
BUT it's also a news story that I can't ignore and can't totally dismiss. I don't mean the content of the story itself and what The Sun Says - NO! What I mean is that way back at the start of this blog's creation I actually speculated about this myself in Blog Entry Number One. If you don't recall that far back, I basically said that I was wondering how they would carry on past the middle of Series 4 next year. One Time Lord generation gone, one companion gone (Rose), cybermen seemingly all gone, Daleks reduced to just one again, the great Face Of Boe dead and soon to be revived Master making a comeback. Options for good storylines definitely ARE being dried up.
Of course, the thing about sci-fi is that The Universe Is A Big Place And All Things Can Happen. And Doctor Who is very much proof of THAT little number!
The question is this: with many good and strong storylines and baddies used up, where is the strength coming from for future series (beyond Series 4 anyway)? It's a GOOD question, isn't it? But why, you say, should we answer it since if we WERE able to answer it then it would make it all far too predictable and therefore not watchable and it might once again descend into the Pit Of Bad Writing. And no-ones wants THAT ugly monster to rear IT'S hideous head, do they?
As i said at the start, this blog entry was inspired by more than one of The Sun's little articles lately. The second nasty little rumour they're putting about is that Freema Agyeman is to be sacked from the show. BUT they don't give any idea as to WHEN this is supposed to happen. Yup, it's another of these Anonymous Sources spreading it about a bit, causing trouble, making chaos.
Well, Dr Who is to be congratulated if The Sun is taking so much interest in it. I mean, there are so many things, so many shows on TV and so many showbiz stars they could choose to attack and undermine. So it is definitely a great complement to all that Russell T. Davies and the crew have achieved in their brilliant revival of The World's Greatest Time Traveller that so much is being said - albeit from not the most reliable journalistic source on the planet!
News stories like these just make me angry that there are people calling themselves journalists who just try to create the news by extrapolating the "truth" from Anonymous Sources who might have 1001 reasons why they would want to damage the people or insitutions they give their little leaks on. This is what we get from a free press of course, but that is not any topic of THIS blog.
I was thinking and wondering about this all last evening after reading about it. Today I read this news story from ITV News which did put me at my ease a bit mainly because of the speed of the reaction from the BBC to The Sun's story. In it, a BBC spokesman has described the story as "idle speculation". Good! Err .... but hold on a moment. Do I believe an Anonymous Source or an Anonymous Spokesman? Hmmm .... well, I prefer the spokesman's view myself. I guess it shows that maybe we believe what we want to believe! Well, let's say that I believe what the BBC says over and above what The Sun newspaper says! NO CONTEST!! The spokesman also said that "the BBC has a long-term commitment to Doctor Who". Nuff said! Case closed (almost!).
Last of all, I want to comment on this report from Sky News that Russell T. Davies wants to have more time to concentrate on other projects. He might well, yes, and after all Doctor Who is not the only thing he has done as we well know. Certainly he has a lot of good shows on TV now and from the near-past. But the nature of writing for TV and for a programme like Doctor Who is, unfortunately, that you DO have to give it a lot of your time. But I see that even now RTD is delegating more of the writing to others - look at Helen Raynor's credit in the Daleks In Manhattan story when in actual fact it was Russell's ideas that were given her to put together (and I see now she doesn't do Script Editing any more!). In addition, as much as I am enjoying this two-parter Human Nature / Family Of Blood, we all know full well that the idea is from a book. I wonder how many other Dr Who stories started off life as books - not many I'll bet! So that is possible another indication that RTD is trying to make time for himself and his other work. I also read here in this news story from 23rd March this year on some kind of speculation from the Series 3 Launch Party about a possible "spin off" movie. Now that IS INTERESTING!!
So, in summary, any thought of killing off Doctor Who after Series 4 or at any time before that is completely out of the question and the BBC would be stark-staring bonkers to quit on such a bankable number as The Doc! ZAP!!!!!! CASE CLOSED (in a Judoon kind of way)!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)